Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald E. Childs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 19:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ronald E. Childs

Self-written vanity page. Doesn't appear to be notable, google shows less than 300 hits. GeeCee 11:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as vanity and copyvio. I tagged it as copyvio just now; it's copied from here (go, then click on "bio. profile"). Mangojuice^talk 11:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ProhibitOnions 12:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

• Save I authored the text, it is original and I own the copyright. It's interesting that a bunch of white guys get to login and determine that the chronicling of an African American's accomplishments is "vanity," while a person of European descent is merely scholarly, lettered or credentialed when similarly detailed. So, I have fewer than 300 listings on Google. How many mentions are required to be considered "notable" by your standards? John H. Johnson published the leading black magazines in the United States for more than 50 years and he merits no mention in The World Book encyclopedia. You all need to stop taking your perpetual creative license with our heritage. That I don't have a search engine hit for each and every article I've written over the past 25 years is not news. In fact, how many do each of you have? Google? Yahoo!? Ask.com? Tell us.

Ronald E. Childs

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.