Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Gunzburger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ron_Gunzburger

Ron_Gunzburger (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Mamma mia. This crap is mind blowing. This guy is known for nothing other than a blog and was clearly written by the man himself. I hereby decree this wiki page "nominated for deletion". Amanduhh 03:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Please observe WP:NPA and do not launch a personal attack on the subject of the article. Also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball so please do not make predictions about the future of the individual. Personal attack deleted from the nomination per WP:BLP.Edison 18:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The nominator's tone notwithstanding, it doesn't change the fact that this man's primary claims to fame are writing a non-noteable blog, losing twice in campaigns for state judicial seats, and being the assistant attorney to this and that subcommittee for this and that sliver of the county legal system. None of those things establish notability. Still, be nice Amanduhh. Consequentially 22:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If you look here you will see that majority of the article as it is today (without splitting into sections) was written by a now defunct user 'Politics1'. Anyway, the blog (or the author, as we're discussing here) are both non-notable. I've also found this in comments on Daily Kos - However, Ron Gunzburger has written things that suggests he's getting tired of putting so much work into Politics1.com as a hobby. So, here we have it. He's even getting bored of running that place himself. The man himself has not achieved anything worth mentioning on Wikipedia, either. --timecop 13:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. and vanity, 100% worthless, blog related. - Femmina 13:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - self promotion. Mikemill 01:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not as noteable of site as LGF or KOS.
• Delete - Not notable. JuanXonValdez 03:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• redirect to Politics1 which currently has an article and may be notable. JoshuaZ 06:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of being the primary subject of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Guy (Help!) 10:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. - Abscissa 18:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Jeff 18:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.