Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Christmas traditions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Christmas worldwide. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 07:49Z

[edit] Romanian Christmas traditions

Romanian Christmas traditions (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is a stub, and has been for over 2 years. It has no reliable sources, and it is pretty clear that material to expand this does not exist or is scarce. I have moved all the relevant material on this article to Christmas worldwide, where stubs on this topic belong. Are we to have an article for every country in the Christmas worldwide article? There simply isn't enough material to warrent this having its own article seperate from Christmas worldwide, especially since some of the other countries Christmas traditions listed in Christmas worldwide have more content than this article, and they still don't have their own article for Christmas traditions. Sefringle 06:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect Odd, my edit didnt take. Redirect. Sources undoubtably exist in Romanian language sources, but no one's added them. Redirect, a content matter. Someone can always go back and re-expand the article later if they do the research or it's worthwhile. - Denny 07:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect until someone expands it into a useful article. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 08:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Christmas worldwide. The text of this article is already in Christmas worldwide, so it may have already been merged, in which case it must be redirected per GFDL. If it wasn't merged (i.e., if this is a fork), then still redirect as it is a plausible (if not entirely common) search term. -- Black Falcon 21:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect This could be a very interesting article but currently doesn't merit its place and doesn't have the sources. Suriel1981 09:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect for the time being. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 05:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect I can't say it better than Suriel1981 just did. Noroton 04:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.