Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Weaver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 00:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Weaver

Roman Weaver (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Seemingly non-notable actor. No reliable sources present for article (just a lot of claims). "Most notable role" was as a recurring on a TV show produced by a local network that only aired 14 episodes total. Declined speedy. Also, probable COI. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 00:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as nonnotable per nom and per WP:COI issues, reads like spam/advert. Cirt (talk) 03:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, promotional CV for non-notable actor without an imdb page (not that having one is by itself near the minimal requirements of WP:ENTERTAINER). --Dhartung | Talk 04:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete because it is promotional material and lacks reliable sources; the claims being made cannot be verified per WP:V. Happyme22 (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, agreeing with above points on WP:V; once you strip out the unverified/unverifiable stuff, there's a whole lot of nothing left. Even the image (Image:Jason.jpg) has a copyright warning on it (though it'd likely get dropped considering it's almost surely his own). --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete On close reading, not sure there's a assertion of notability in the article. Once again, there is a problem of verifiability even for that which is asserted. There is no significant media coverage that I can find. Unable to locate reliable sources supporting a claim of notability on reviewing about 90 Unique Google hits. I did find information about Roman weavers, that is weavers in Ancient Rome, who were apparently a highly skilled lot. Search for the full "Roman Jason Cory Weaver" came up empty. There was a handful of hits for "Roman Jason Weaver" that did not look like they fit the bill. They did not seem concerned with the content of this article. A search through Allmusic did not support notability. He is not mentioned on the Allmusic page about "Fusebox". I found a "Jason Weaver on IMDB, but I think it is someone else. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 00:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Someone who is not at work might want to consider retagging for Speedy Deletion. I do not see where the speedy was declined. I only see that it was dettaged by the creator of the article. Cheers,

I took it as a declined speedy when an admin (User:DGG) didn't restore the tag/delete the article, but restored the COI tag. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 07:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Good point. He's pretty thorough. Macht nichts, in the long run. Maybe something will turn up that changes my mind. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 13:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• I did see that the website links refering to him as Roman Jason Weaver are correct. The Jason Weaver on IMDB is not him. There seems to be some confusion with the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.197.146.124 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• I did notice that the fusebox that is mentioned on Allmusic is the christian band fusebox. the fusebox he refers to in the prick magazine online article seems to support the claim that the band actually exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.197.146.124 (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.