Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll up TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mr.Z-man 02:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Roll up TV

Roll up TV (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Previously deleted, not even available yet. Perhaps can be created and expanded if/when item is actually created. Jmlk17 06:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. There are a few articles cited stating that rollable displays are coming out real soon now, but there's nothing which speaks specifically of roll-up televisions. In any case, it's hardly useful to tell the reader that the article's topic doesn't exist. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep major magazines and news sources caught up to this possible invention, meets WP:N easily This is a Secret account 23:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spellcast (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, easily notable. In addition to the four sources cited in the article, a Google news archive search turns up several more. The concept is clearly notable even if no products are yet available. DHowell 02:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, ditto. --Bachcell (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Rename to Bendable display technology. This is a general technology that has been around for so long I forget when I first saw it. It is not restricted to TVs so if there are ample sources, rename and expand. If not Delete until there are enough sources to write the article. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  • OK as the author of this short lil stub, perhaps I can weigh in here, though I really tried not to! I made it from a red link, and created what I could from the sources I found. I'm not a big fan of the name, so I certainly support a rename at the very least (for other ideas than those listed above, I created other redirects to the article which might sound better.) Since it is all sourced information, I also would support a merge and redirect to Organic light-emitting diode#Commercial uses. ~Eliz81(C) 02:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.