Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rol Cortishane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 20:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rol Cortishane

Rol Cortishane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Cruft about a book not released yet, most likely by its author. I'll be nominating a few other pages with it once I get the templates up. Luigi30 (Taλk) 14:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they're also about the same book:

Fleam the sword (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Weren (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Keep It's a character in a incomplete series, not a incomplete book. [1] [2] [3] [4] Rocket000 16:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Per Rocket000. ILovePlankton^(L—n) 17:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Slight merge and redirect to an article about the series itself. None of this guy's books have their own articles yet, so having articles about parts of their contents is sort of putting the cart before the horse. And I would like to emphasize slight merge because, as it stands now, this is OR, lacking reliable third-party sources. - Che Neuvara 18:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• If the series themselves are notable, then this can be merged into an article on the series (without the excessive plot summary). If they aren't notable, then neither are the characters, so then these articles would have to be deleted. Melsaran (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Andrew c ^[talk] 15:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep all - Sufficient reference material for an article. Being about the same book is not a sufficient reason to delete Fleam the sword and Weren. They should have been nominated separately. Here is some for Rol Cortishane:
  • Cooke, Paul. (November 6, 2004) Birmingham Post Books: Reviews: The mark of a good read. The Mark of Ran by Paul Kearney, Bantam Press. pounds 10.99. Reviewed by Paul Cooke. Section: Features; Page 53.
  • The Canberra Times (June 12, 2005) Take three: Firethorn By Sarah Micklem. HarperCollins. 387pp. $29.95.
  • Southland Times (July 9, 2005) Action and intrigue. Section: Features Books; Page 7.
  • ThisisBradford.co.uk (January 6, 2006) Book Reviews: The Sea Beggars: The Mark of Ran -- Paul Kearney. Section: Features.
  • Kallam, Clay. (February 5, 2006) Contra Costa Times Worlds beyond: Slightly sketchy "Children" builds on series. Section: Features; Page F4.
  • Boisvert, Will. (December 8, 2006) Entertainment Weekly This Forsaken Earth. Section: The reviews: Books; Issue 910; Page 100.

-- Jreferee t/c 16:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.