Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Eatwell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 06:36, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Roger Eatwell

No information on who he is, merely a list of reviews of a book he's written. Appears to be an advert. Delete.OpenToppedBus - Talk 11:09, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Notable author, needs a strong rewrite though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:46, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Appears to have written a number of books. Capitalistroadster 00:10, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WTF? Why was mah vote removed?? -BrowardBulldawg 01:27, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not an article. Gamaliel 06:03, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep He is a leading authority on Fascism. Definitely needs big improvements, mind you. Keresaspa
• Delete If it walks like an ad, talks like an ad, and quacks like an ad, its an ad! Hohokus 23:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Ad! Next! ShureMicGuy 19:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Account created today, all edits are to VfD. RickK 22:48, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.