Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Clapp Greenhouses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'll add a mention in Lyle E. Littlefield Ornamentals Trial Garden as DGG suggests. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Roger Clapp Greenhouses

Roger Clapp Greenhouses (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't appear notable enough for separate article. Merge to University of Maine, or delete outright. SarekOfVulcan 19:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• • Preferred merge would be to Littlefield Garden, as below.--SarekOfVulcan 14:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - having it separate allows it to be better categorized. GlassFET 19:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Its a single research facility within a single department. Fundamentally no more notable than any other such facility--all large bio depts have greenhouses, and animal care facilities, and so on, almost none of which will be notable. Some will be named, raising money being the sort of art that it is. But since it has a small public display element (3,000 sq ft), it could be mentioned in the article on their botanic garden, Lyle E. Littlefield Ornamentals Trial Garden. I think most botanic gardens would be notable. DGG (talk) 01:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete per lack of independent sources attesting to notability Corpx 16:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Corpx and DGG. Nice facility and all, but the requirements of WP:SCI are sorely lacking here. --Aarktica 14:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.