Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockford-Montgomery Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus but truth be told, as is, this is an A7 speedy. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rockford-Montgomery Labs

Rockford-Montgomery Labs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No references, no assertion of notability. Hellno2 (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - only one gnews hit, which doesn't establish notability.  Frank  |  talk  22:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Checking the archives, I find 45 Google News hits. Not sure if any of them contain significant coverage, though... Jakew (talk) 21:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Regardless, the article itself does not assert notability, either with references, or a description of something that makes the company encyclopedic.Hellno2 (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Apparently the subject of considerable controversy, based ion he GN results, such as [1], among others .DGG (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep: Per the references shown. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: This reference and others similar to it may just be enough to save this article. But this article does need some completion. It does not even have a category, and it probably should be marked as a stub for now until it is finished. I have little familiarity with the topic, so I do not know what category to place it in, but I would like to see this Wikipedia basics filled in before this discussion is closed.Hellno2 (talk) 00:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.