Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockbusters complete clues and answers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rockbusters complete clues and answers

nn listcruft of...some sort of radio show that Ricky Gervais was involved in. Delete, or very slightly minutely possibly merge if you have any clue where this would go.  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 04:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

• Geez, where do they find this cruft, and why do they bring it to Wikipedia? Delete. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 06:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I remember reading somewhere that Wikipedia strove to become the "sum total of human knowledge". While most editors strive for expanding "human knowledge", but the creators of "The Opening Credits of America's Funniest Home Videos", "List of Scams of Ed, Edd n Eddy", and the above Rockbusters article (no offense intended against them) appear to be leaning heavily towards the "sum total" aspect of the equation. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 06:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Although this information is useful if you're interesting in Karl Pilkington, it is available on fansites.
    • I think that this article is a useful resource for people interested in Karl Pilkington and is related to the world's most popular podcast at the moment. I'm currently editing the Karl Pilkington page and this information is relavent.
      • I think the article you refer to would be served better by placing one or two examples in the relevant section, followed by an external link to a site with the complete list. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 20:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is basically a quiz. --Malthusian (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, indiscriminate collection of information. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-10 05:23Z
• Delete per above. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 09:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.