Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockbitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep/nom withdrawn (closed by non-admin) RMHED (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rockbitch

• Withdrawn per WP:MUSIC and WP:SNOW. Avruch^Talk 01:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Rockbitch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Written like an advertisement, contains no sources or assertion of notability. Avruch^Talk 01:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Does not appear to be notable, and there aren't any sources in the article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment-- no deletion tag on article. Kablammo (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: I just added it. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.   jj137 (Talk) 02:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep Rockbitch have been around for a while, they are notable, they do meet WP:MUSIC. They have garnered quite a lot of press coverage over the years, if only for getting banned in most counties of the UK. 69,400 gHits. ---- WebHamster 04:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• They've even had a UK Ch5 documentary made about them. ---- WebHamster 04:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and add reliable sources. Exxolon (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, there is an allmusic bio, and the existence of one strongly tracks with WP:MUSIC. There are sources in Google Books and even Google Scholar, and Google News results alone cover about five languages. --Dhartung | Talk 05:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I'd heard of them before this AfD, and coverage appears to be significant enough for an article.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 07:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep passes point 12 of WP:MUSIC as they were the subject of a BBC TV show [1]. They probably pass point 5 too. Lugnuts (talk) 10:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Passes WP:MUSIC. Needs expansion and refs. If doubts about notability and/or references exist, there are appropriate tags that could be added to the article rather than bringing it straight to AfD.--Michig (talk) 10:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, passes #12 of WP:MUSIC, and seems to pass WP:RS in general. Should be tagged with {{refimprove}} instead. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.