Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Trial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rock Trial

Rock Trial (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Does not assert notability, severe problems with WP:V and WP:RS, no reliable sources cited to support notability. There is no reason given whatsoever why a music school adaptation and production of a commonly-performed Gilbert and Sullivan operetta should be notable enough for a Wikipedia entry. Moreschi ^Deletion! 09:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete RNCM is notable, MUGSS may be notable, this production very evidently is not, given that I can't find any non-trivial independent sources about it. Guy (Help!) 12:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. University and community theatre groups are generally not notable (there are thousands and thousands of them). Adaptations of shows performed by amateur and university theatre groups are not notable, unless they become frequently performed by a number of groups or somehow become well-known. There are many adaptations of G&S shows that have been created by professional companies, let alone by the hundreds or thousands of community and university G&S theatre companies, and they should not each have a Wiki page. See WP:MUS. -- Ssilvers 22:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This might become notable in the future but it is not so yet. If it does become more commonly performed at some future date, I'd have no problem with it being recreated at that time. -- Derek Ross | Talk 00:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: It simply can't be notable with a three-day run by a single amateur group. Adam Cuerden ^talk 01:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable student production, no outside non-trivial reviews, no claim of notability beyond being performed once by a student group. They seem to have their own wiki, they can easily move this article there. Mak (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Not verifiable. - Peregrine Fisher 22:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Admirable, I'm sure, but not, on present evidence, of permanent note.Tim riley 23:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.