The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
A hoax about a 5th century explorer from North Woodham. Originally tagged {{prod}}, but an anon removed the tag. Now it's here. Pilatus 22:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete makey-uppy, dull rubbish. Camillus(talk) 22:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete Oh, it's not even even a good or amusing hoax. Tearlach 02:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete unverified, possible hoax Avi 02:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per above. Not even funny, so not worth a BJAODN. --Kinu 07:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.