Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert P. Guralnick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 00:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Robert P. Guralnick
This article was originally nominated for CSD, but the tag was removed by User:RobGuralnick (not the page's creator)... in fact, the last three edits to the page were made by him. While this person seems like a great professor, I believe that this fails WP:BIO (in addition to concerns about WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and the like). Eliz81 20:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Eliz81 20:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —Espresso Addict 02:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not my area, so correct me if I'm wrong, but per a quick scan of his CV, as an Associate Professor with only around 35 publications, none of which seem especially groundbreaking, and no major awards or invited society memberships, Guralnick doesn't seem currently to meet WP:PROF. Assuming RobGuralnick is the same guy, I wouldn't oppose userifying the current page, with a view to reassessing his notability in the future. Espresso Addict 02:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Expresso Addict. He's not notable and the page reads like a profile at a university website. - Shudde talk 02:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Userfy and delete. Bearian 00:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:PROF criteria. *drew 15:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
