Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert James Ley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as hoax. Daniel Case 21:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Robert James Ley

Robert James Ley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Patent hoax. Lame one at that. Askari Mark (Talk) 04:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. This is a case where even though the words all make sense, I would still consider it patent nonsense. Resolute 04:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. as above Nicko (Talk•Contribs) 04:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the article's so silly that I can't believe I just went to the bother of checking, but Google is strangely quiet on a man who is worth 900M. Iain99 06:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax, nonsense, fails WP:NOTE, and WP:CRYSTAL. Useight 08:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This article is clearly a hoax. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. no sources. Liransh 11:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Also no ghits for company. --Fabrictramp 17:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.