Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hersov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Hersov

Robert Hersov (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Procedural nomination, no opinion. AecisBrievenbus 11:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete per {{db-bio}}, as originally tagged. Prod reason was "executive bio without any major importance". It fails the requirements of WP:BIO. --Evb-wiki (talk) 12:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete- This is nothing more than a resumè.---Iconoclast Horizon 12:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs)
  • Not speedy since it claims importance--it just has to claim it, not show it or have it--claiming even minor importance is enough to avoid speedy., according to WP:CSD and deletion policy. But certainly delete--i originally changed it to prod with the sumary given above. DGG (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete - it's a CV/resumè/profile about a non-notable, not an article. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions and the list of South Africa-related deletions. AecisBrievenbus 21:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, the Guardian called him "a pin up for many budding internet entrepreneurs" [1] which implies at least a hint of notability, but I don't see much other in depth coverage of him [2] so weak delete anyway. His companies are probably more notable than he is - a brief mention in one of those articles would be more appropriate. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 23:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.