Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted WP:CSD#G12 separately from this process as a blatant copyright violation. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 05:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Robert H. Miller

Robert H. Miller (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. Some CoI risk too - the main editor of the page has a user name similar to the subject of the article. AndrewHowse (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Almost everything on this page is plagiarized from here.Hazillow (talk) 01:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Update: Maybe not exactly plagiarized, since it is listed as a source, and maybe the editor is very likely to be the subject of the article, but I don't see a way we could independently verify that.Hazillow (talk) 01:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per Hazilow RogueNinja_talk 01:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Medical school deans are very likely to be notable. In this case, a Google Scholar search at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3ARH+author%3AMiller+otolaryngology&btnG=Search&as_subj=med lists several papers of interest, including two cited by more than 30 others. I have tried to clean up the prose. --Eastmain (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Medical school deans are almost always notable. He is also the president of a major medical organization. Dgf32 (talk) 04:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment This might be moot if it's really a a copyvio. --AndrewHowse (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.