Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Farrell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 15:28, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Farrell

A research staff member. Article fails to establish notability. Sjakkalle 07:37, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unless expanded. While I tend to complain that Wikipedia demands far higher levels of achievement for scientists than for actors or sportspeople (where merely being employed as one gives you a good chance of an article), I'd say that the article needs to actually say what the scientist has done to contribute. This merely states he is employed. Average Earthman 09:05, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — The Thomas J. Watson Research Center page is barely a stub, so this doesn't even appear to be merge-worthy. — RJH 17:38, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, I've expanded the article on the Thomas J. Watson Research Center, but I've not bothered mentioning every manager of every division for some reason... Average Earthman 19:52, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with Earthman's first comment DDerby 10:02, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.