Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Johnston
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Robert D. Johnston
User keeps placing original research material that is not sourced with verifiable references.
Cross AfD: Armistead L. Long, Charles S. Venable, Archibald C. Godwin, Cullen A. Battle, Robert D. Johnston, David G. McIntosh, Montgomery D. Corse, Robert Ransom, Jr., and James B. Walton - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 08:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- comment: this is so far from being OR as to be a likely copyvio; and the source is easily verifiable: just check out a copy of Stewart Sifakis, Who Was Who in the Confederacy (1989) ISBN 0816022046. --Paularblaster (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, not OR and verifiable, unless someone has a copy of the reference book and can check that this information is inaccurate. Pburka (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep See "Confederate Military History: A Library of Confederate States History" By General Clement A. Evans, p 320 [1]. See "Stephen Dodson Ramseur: Lee's Gallant General" By Gary W. Gallagher p 121[2]. See "Histories of the Several Regiments and Battalions from North Carolina..." By Walter Clark, p422 [3]. There are many books which at least mention him hidden behing the "snippet view" which contain unknown amounts of detail. Satisfies WP:BIO. An ill-founded nomination apparently lacking any effort to find whether references existed. Edison (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
