Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Benfer, Jr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete, per CSD:G4 and almost G3 too, because someone's deliberately recreating this just to cause a nuisance. Stifle (talk) 16:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Benfer, Jr

Recreation of Knox (animator) which was deleted Feb 6, 2006 and Robert Benfer deleted Feb 17. Still not notable. Jamoche 06:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep - The previous article was deleted because of vanity, this article was not written by Knox, nor anyone who knows Knox. You may not have heard of him, but just because he's not famous doesn't make his information a worthy encyclopedia article. He has made a significant impact in online claymation, many fans and fellow clamators regard him as the "King of Klay" [1][2][3]. He has a loyal (albeit somewhat reckless, just see the talk page for the original Knox article...) and large fanbase that should have some coverage on this wiki. Calicore 07:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. I don't necessarily believe that prior deletions are valid reasons for future deletions, but despite the fact that it may not be a vanity article, it is still non-notable. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪ 07:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - definately non-notable for wikipedia purposes. May be worthly of an entry in years to come but not at present.Peripitus 10:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Peripitus. --Jadriaen 11:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 12:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as recreation of previously deleted material M1ss1ontomars2k4 15:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Re-Delete; might be speedyable as {{nn-bio}} or {{db-repost}}. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - as per Calicore. Another reason why notability is subjective, POV, and should not be used as a criteria for inclusion in or deletion from Wikipedia. DanielZimmerman 19:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Very strong keep-I have a right to post what i want, and if i want to post an article a Robert Benfer, I'll post it! YOU HAVE NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO DELETE WHAT I WANT!!! JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!!! PLEASE!!! --Philber 22 22:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Philber 22
  • You may want to take a look at WP:OWN. If you aren't willing to see your work edited or deleted, this isn't the right place for you to contribute. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 14:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.