Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbers on High Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus so keep for now. (aeropagitica) 22:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robbers on High Street

Does not meet requirements of WP:MUSIC. -Nv8200p talk 15:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - The record releases clearly meet WP:MUSIC. This AfD is pointless. PT (s-s-s-s) 23:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - does not meet any of the criteria of WP:MUSIC. The closest it comes to is the soundtrack item, but to quote from the guideline, "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that page.)"--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 00:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete That record label is not a major record label. Also per Gay Cdn. T REXspeak 01:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, [1] shows two albums for sale on Amazon.com, published by New Line (the music arm of New Line Cinema). In my eyes that does pass WP:MUSIC, and for a company originally set-up to release Original Sound Tracks from their parent company's films to take on an act like this must mean that there's something about them. QuagmireDog 13:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - perhaps we are disagreeing on the definition of "released two or more albums" as the two listed on both Amazon and in the article itself are an album (Tree City) and an EP (Fine Lines). For me an EP is not an album.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
To me an EP is a short album in the same way a 50 or 30 minute film is a short film - same thing just less of it. That's my interpretation of it, and I'm not saying that you're wrong but by the same token I still stand by my own opinion. There seems to be a very fine line in this case between keep and delete, I'd rather give this one a go and look at it again in 6 months to see if citations and news of a new album appear, than consign it to deletion with a stack of NN bands who aren't even signed. QuagmireDog 16:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.