Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob van der Nol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 20:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rob van der Nol

Rob van der Nol (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article does not establish the notability of the subject and does not provide reference information other than the subject's own webpage TheMindsEye 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable and due to the lack of necessary sources. --The Way 08:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, delete. -- Hoary 15:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (Talk) 18:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I don't see any real claim of notability here. --Brianyoumans 23:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Elaboration (since I've already voted): (i) Fails any test of notability, as no solo exhibition is mentioned, no book is mentioned, and the only claim is that he's one of nine nominees for a prize. (ii) Fails WP:V, as not one source is specified. (iii) Apparently abandoned: it describes December 2006 in the future tense. -- Hoary 15:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Um, no. Baleeted. ~ Flameviper 22:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.