Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Redding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rob redding

NN, possible vanity. - FrancisTyers 01:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete pn! Keep and move to Rob Redding and add tags. - FrancisTyers 12:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Black radio personality heard throughout US. Please provide serious nom with reasons. -- JJay 01:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Check this out. One of the articles that comes up says he is syndicated in all 50 states, which is pretty notable, if you ask me. Just a suggestion, because I've messed up before too, you might want to read into Wikipedia's Vanity Guidelines in the future before you reccomend "possible vanity." JHMM13 (T | C) 01:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Although the article could use a lot of work, he is a syndicated radio host and merits inclusion in my opinion. Movementarian 02:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but this entire article should be rewritten. I can't find the source, but it looks a copy/paste to me, which means its likely a copyvio (if it's proven a copyvio, then it will obviously need to be deleted, but I can't prove it). Anyway, the person warrants an article. --Rob 03:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Conditional Keep Article should only be kept if it is re-written and made better.-->Newyorktimescrossword 03:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Conditional Keep. Resolve the issues mentioned in the other comments. Logophile 10:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Yes, the article is poorly written - but that merits a {{cleanup}} or {{wikify}} tag, not a nomination to be deleted as Newyorktimescrossword has suggested. -Rebelguys2 12:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I'm closing this as KEEP but the page is in a sorry state. To the "conditional keeps" above, note that bad format is never (that I know of) a cause for deletion, if it is truly bad format and nothing else. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.