Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob DiFrancesco

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 01:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rob DiFrancesco

Rob DiFrancesco (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Substantial recreation of prod, still mirrored at [1]. Since this was a prod, its ineligible for G4. That said, the article is borderline uneyclopedic, and fails WP:BIO. MrPrada (talk) 20:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable staffer for an Assemblyman Ohconfucius (talk) 08:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Article lists sources and does make a claim of notability, specifically the "youngest chairman" bit. This sounds odd, but I get a sense of deja vu that I can't place. TN‑X-Man 18:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete "youngest elected X" is first of all very hard if not impossible to verify, and second tends to bea euphemism for "jut aboutto start becoming notable". This would if accepted give us one person for every possible minor office to be found, none of whom would be the least notable. DGG (talk) 22:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Local politician, no broader notability. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I read the article and it can't be a vanity article, no onw wouel write an article to make himself look like such a failure. It must be an attack on one low-level politician by another.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.