Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rmit publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to RMIT University. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 09:14Z

[edit] Rmit publishing

Rmit publishing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Pure advertising. Emeraude 21:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete unless they provide sources for their claims. User:Logical2u_Talk 22:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete narrowly misses being db-spam. Still not notable. Danny Lilithborne 03:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  10:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Needs sources and clean up, but in general University presses are important. I want to see what this might look like if someone who knows about it removes the ad stuff and adds NPOV material. If they do that, then keep. --Bduke 12:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into RMIT University, as its a business unit of the University. Gnangarra 05:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.