Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Ridge (building)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] River Ridge (building)

River Ridge (building) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This building is of no historical importance and does not meet the notability requirements. Also it is mostly original research by high school students who attend classes in the building. Any important information is already contained in the article Trinity School at River Ridge. Theredhouse7 03:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - This AfD appears to be connected to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People of Praise, the second tenant listed. --68.239.79.97 03:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- not any more remarkable than any other building in Bloomington, Minnesota. The notable part of this building is already contained in the Trinity School article. In fact, Bloomington has only four notable buildings: the Mall of America, the Gideon Pond House (listed on the National Register of Historic Places), Normandale Community College, and maybe the old town hall. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 15:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 00:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Schools may be N because of being in a historic building, but it is a rare school building that will be notable separately. In any case, the school has apparently just moved out. DGG 03:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment - The school will be moving out at the end of the year. Theredhouse7 04:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Just wondering, what does the picture of the grass add to the article? Wouldn't a picture of the actual building be more appropriate? --Infrangible 02:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.