The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Ordinary condo development that doesn't merit an article. I can't think of anything encyclopedic about this one. — Stevie is the man!Talk | Work 20:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete, until construction actually starts, at least.--Andeh 20:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete does not seem to be particularly notable --rogerd 21:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete It is listed on the official site as proposed, and hasn't been changed since 2003. I think it's a no goer. Ben W Belltalk 21:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.