Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riva Tholoor Philip
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Splash - tk 23:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Riva Tholoor Philip
I looked into this one and found that an article on the same subject was VfD'ed a couple years ago (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rivaji). Though tempted to put on a db-repost tag, I think it would be better to subject this one to a full AfD discussion. Things do change at light speed in the Online Age. Though the prose smacks of self-promotion, there may be a chance that the article's subject has enough notability that he'd rate a Wikipedia article of his own, and thus the article would be worth retooling in a NPOV direction. However, I do not find that the man or the organization he leads are notable enough to satisfy WP:NOTE, based on my quick look for more sources on the Internet. --Dynaflow babble 07:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- delete Deciphering the article, he's a ex-student politician who has formed a special interest chapter of his political party, but hasn't actually done much yet for the outside world to know.DGG 23:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Would-be politician never elected to a real office. Clarityfiend 00:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I have just discovered that an anon IP removed the AfD template from the article two days ago. I have warned the user and watchlisted the article (as I should have in the first place - d'oh!). --Dynaflow babble 16:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- ...And the same anon just removed it again. --Dynaflow babble 07:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- ...And now it was removed by the original author. --Dynaflow babble 08:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.