Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritch Winter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. -Djsasso (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ritch Winter

Ritch Winter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails the notability guideline. The article is also orphaned and unreferenced. It's also non-neutral, and is written in Winter's favour PeterSymonds | talk 17:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep, needs rewrite & sources, but Google News search indicates he is a well-known NHL figure. --Dhartung | Talk 18:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. —Resolute 18:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep A patently obvious case of WP:COI as well as created by User:Tschockey, however Winter is a notable figure in the hockey world. I'll see if I can clean it up and remove the obvious bias from it. Resolute 18:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment. Hockey is obviously an interest of the user, but Tsc means nothing, and no conflict of interest should be assumed. Ask User:UWMSports. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
      • Comment TSC stands for the name of the company the subject started. -Djsasso (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep pending cleanup by Resolute. -Djsasso (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Which I have just done. It should now be a servicable, referenced and linked stub. Resolute 19:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Move to speedy keep (as nominator). Resolute (talk · contribs) has rewritten the article, establishing notability and removing POV. Great work! PeterSymonds | talk 19:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.