Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritacco Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ritacco Center
Delete as an un-notable building. Gay Cdn 00:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Emc² (CONTACT ME) 02:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- delete NN school building Pete.Hurd 02:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not just a school building. It's also a venue for commercial events. Google lists a lot of ticket sales companies with a page about events at the Ritacco Center. For example, see http://www.gotickets.com/concert/martina_mcbride/martina_mcbride_with_leann_rimes_at_ritacco_center_on_july_30_2006_730_pm_in_toms_river_nj.php TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Google currently lists "about 26900" hits for "Ritacco Center." 68.50.203.109 08:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep notable in that it is multipurpose, many non-spam/advert links. Article needs revision. Rob 10:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- So we're goging to have a wikipedia article for all multipurpose buildings, because that's really unusually rare?! Pete.Hurd 15:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Rebuttal- Are you're suggesting I'm proposing we allow articles for every multipurpose building? I think my point is quite specific to that building, ie. the 'it' in my sentence. Maybe my position on the original point will be proven to be incorrect. If the vote is to delete the article, then by all means delete it. But I humbly suggest you refrain from putting thoughts or words into my mouth, since you appear to have decided that my single comment is meant to include all potential articles that might be about buildings. Just as an aside, you might double check your spelling before posting an flame. Rob 12:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm still totally unenlightened. What is it that makes this building notable, and how ought we to generalize what ever it is that makes this building notable to future cases? Pete.Hurd 14:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Rebuttal- Are you're suggesting I'm proposing we allow articles for every multipurpose building? I think my point is quite specific to that building, ie. the 'it' in my sentence. Maybe my position on the original point will be proven to be incorrect. If the vote is to delete the article, then by all means delete it. But I humbly suggest you refrain from putting thoughts or words into my mouth, since you appear to have decided that my single comment is meant to include all potential articles that might be about buildings. Just as an aside, you might double check your spelling before posting an flame. Rob 12:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- So we're goging to have a wikipedia article for all multipurpose buildings, because that's really unusually rare?! Pete.Hurd 15:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I see a school building that sometimes sells tickets. I'm failing to see how this is different, or more notable, from any other multipurpose building that sells tickets. Tychocat 09:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If it does bring 'world-renowned entertainment to the community' in the future the article can be recreated but for now, NN. BlueValour 01:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
