Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishi Prasad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rishi Prasad

Rishi_Prasad (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Article is about a publication which is non-notable outside the context of Sant Sri Asaramji Bapu. Sfacets 13:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Categorizing debate: M (Media and music) ◄Zahakiel► 15:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete: as empty, little/no context/text. --Ragib 17:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I know I have been slow in providing my inputs to the article but the article is very important to introduce and define a very large publication in India. The magazine is available in many different languages including English and has subscribers all over the world. I would like to have some more time to improve the article.... Thanks Rohit 19:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per nom. Single line stub having almost no encyclopedic information. - KNM Talk 02:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. There appears to be more than one "Rishi Prasad" that is notable. I expect that this magazine is notable (it appears to be translated into many languages), but it is hard to justify one sentence. John Vandenberg 11:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. Madhava 1947 (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of contex without prejudice to proper recreation. This isn't even really a stub, which has to establish context. I don't quite think it's speedy-able. -- Black Falcon 22:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.