Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ripclaw

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. ~~ N (t/c) 21:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ripclaw

Non-notable AFAIK, but who the heck am I? Does anyone know much about this? Is it noteable and I'm clueless? thanks --KillerChihuahua 19:05, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. If Cyberforce doesn't warrant an entry, then neither does Ripclaw. TheMadBaron 19:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Sentence fragments are not encyclopedic. It should not be our job to research and justify deleting such trifles; it should be incumbent on the original author to post enough info to show that notability is warranted. paul klenk 19:43, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as very short article with little to no context. Tagged as such. — Phil Welch 21:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Done. ~~ N (t/c) 21:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.