Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringtone Artists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--JForget 01:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ringtone Artists

Ringtone Artists (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An WP:OR-y article which attempts to define "Ringtone artists" as those whose ringtones outsell albums. While "Ringtone artists" has a number of ghits, none appear to be reliable sources, leading me to classify this as a non- notable neologism. It seems unverifiable, and in violation of what what wikipedia is not. Also, a prod was removed by an IP editor. Bfigura (talk) 15:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as nom for the above. Wikipedia is not for non-notable neologisms that were made up. Bfigura (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. NN neo at best. --Evb-wiki 16:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep it. It's at least as useful as a list of imaginary Jedis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.187.105 (talk) 16:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC) — 24.211.187.105 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete It's just someone rambling their original research. Spellcast 17:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete agree strongly with spellcast Carter | Talk to me 18:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as OR. Also, not to be a pedant, but I'm pretty sure most neologisms are made up. - Che Nuevara 18:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - point taken :) I'll file that phrase with the Department of Redundancy Department. --Bfigura (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Just delete it already. I guess I'm not 1337 enough for wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.45.25 (talk) 02:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Nah it's not that you're not 1337 enough. All you have to do is read WP:V and WP:NEO next time. Spellcast 07:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.