Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring armature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasMerged to Gramme machine. —Crazytales talk/desk 20:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ring armature

Ring armature (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is original research. No notability asserted. The invention's web site is Terry L Hewett Sr's "Ring Theory" (not linked to from the article), which does not supply any references or clear explanations. From what I understand of the vague description, it is an induction motor or AC motor design, but it is unclear what advantages it would offer. A quote from the inventor site: "The scientific society has reached a blockade in the road to advancement in technology. This is due to several things that i will highlight on this site in the future. But for now I would like to concentrate on the closest advancement mankind has to discovering the ring." Delete. - I see now that the article used to be a stub, only linked to from one article. I think we could do without the stub (integrate it into the single article linking to it). Han-Kwang (t) 13:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep or Merge. No comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.V.E.i. (talk • contribs) 16:32, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
• Merge anything useful to electric motor or induction motor and redirect. Dbromage [Talk] 23:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete An article in science and technology about new and innovative rotary electricval machines should be referenced to multiple books or journal articles. Come back when you have such references. Wikipedia is not a place for first publication of someone's inventions and innovations. (Would that Nikola Tesla and Zénobe Gramme were still around to review the article). Edison 03:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TKD::Talk 08:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note to closing admin: see also User Talk:M.V.E.i.#Your recent AFD comments. Han-Kwang (t) 09:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note I have merged the little stub information there was into the formerly linking article Gramme machine. Han-Kwang (t) 09:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.