Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rilmani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page except signature updates.
The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rilmani
Non notable Dungeons & Dragons monster. Has appeared in a few supplements, but no evidence of third party coverage or in-game significance. J Milburn (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete <SoaD>And what the f*** are YOU?!?!?!</SoaD> -Jéské (v^_^v :L10 Lucario Cleric of Mew) 21:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete — non-notable. All primary sources. Mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This is just one of thousands of non-notable stock characters with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. This article also fails WP:NOT#GUIDE and WP:WAF, so its in universe content is not worth keeping or merging.--Gavin Collins (talk) 09:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- delete per Gavin Collins and Percy Snoodle. It's not apparently possible to expand this beyond a simple in-universe summary - and according to WP:RPG/N, (sources) should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a summary of rules or in-universe information. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete — non-notable. shadzar-talk 21:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
