The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Ian MankaTalk to me! 01:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity entry to me. If not, it's copy-vio from [1]. Delete as non-notable. Essexmutant 19:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete under a suitable combination of vanity and/or non-notability WilyD 21:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete or Speedy for copyvio and lack of any attempt to pass WP:BIO. ---J.S (t|c) 22:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete as nn. We have prod for this kind of stuff. --Ezeu 23:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. —Kymacpherson 14:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.