The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted speedily for having no assertion of significance. Looks like self-promotion. Friday(talk) 17:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
One link to the subject's own website isn't enough evidence of notability. Could have speedy-deleted, but decided to give the article the benefit of the doubt - it's easy to make mistakes when it comes to applying WP:NOTE. Walton monarchist89 17:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.