Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigism (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was moot, speedy deleted. - Mailer Diablo 14:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rigism

REDELETE This article was already deleted once before, as can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigism. It is not sufficiently notable for its own article, and already has a sub-section in the Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing page. Tjstrf 19:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Although it's a parody religion, it has been well noted at many video gaming sites, although not directly, of course. It has been mentioned in a good number of video gaming forums and such. I suggest a rewrite. - XX55XX 19:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Reply - It already has a section in the article for the game it is based on. In which case, a merge/redirect would do the job. --Tjstrf 19:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing. --Durin 19:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - It seems that your logic has defeated me, but Rigism is rather noteworthy because it's hard to say whether it deserves an article or not. - XX55XX 20:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete First of all, I'd like to say that this is coming from somebody who OWNS BIG RIGS. It's literally in my lap as we speak, just so I can make this point. Anyway, the article is a big joke that not even that many people know/care about, and all of the information (that's actual information) is already contained in the Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing article. The "religion" simply isn't notable enough for its own article. I would also not vote for a merge, but perhaps for a redirect. -- Kicking222 20:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kicking222 --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 22:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There is no reason to delete it, the page tells about a legitimate philosophy and a part of internet culture. Why would you want to delete it?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.13 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Because it's not notable and there's no reason to have it since all the information is already given in the Big Rigs page? --Tjstrf 23:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to the article on the game. Delete and recreate redirect as second option. Delete outright as third option. -- saberwyn 02:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Put an end to this nonsense.--Drat (Talk) 06:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing. The concept is only understandable in the context of the game. --Metropolitan90 16:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Or add the page into a new article called "BROTRRers", which talks about the fan club. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.101.13 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per Kicking222. Random stuff made up on forums is rarely notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect that was the best idea, if there's information for it on the big rigs page about it then anyone searching for rigism should be redirected there.
• Redirect to Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing. Useless article and not notable enough. Voretus the Benevolent 15:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Starblind et al. Armon 14:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.