Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Righteous Warrior Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 13:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Righteous Warrior Temple

nn cruft website ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 05:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Tyr_shadowblade I do not understand why this article was slated for deletion mere seconds after I posted it. The information is verifiable, does not violate copyright and is unbiased. And what did User:Swatjester mean by "nn cruft website"? Please be specific as to how this article can be improved, as I'm new to posting here.

The poster deserves more explaination. The criteria for a Wikipedia article about a web site is at WP:WEB. The requirements are set rather high, or every promoted website in the web would have a Wikipedia article. "nn" just means "non-notable", which refers to Wikipedia's requirement that a website or person or band be "notable" to be included. --John Nagle 06:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable website about a non-serious topic.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 06:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Tyr-shadowblade Warriorship is a "non-serious topic"? Mr Binguyen is entitled to his opinion . . . even if it's wrong. I looked at Wikipedia's articles on the topic of notability and understood that this is not necessarilly a "requirement", as "Wikipedia is not paper". I thought RWT was of interest, and their website certainly isn't a fancruft or vanity website. Have any of the people in favor of deletion even looked at the material there?

User:Tyr_shadowblade Just realized that I made a mistake in the first paragraph and edited it. RWT was an organization which created a website and published several books . . . if that makes any difference. Not JUST a website.

• Delete as non-notable, unsourced, unverified cruft. 96 unique G-hits, many of which are from link and mirror sites. Alexa ranking of 2,486,338. [1] if you'd like a chuckle. RGTraynor 16:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Tyr_shadowblade Fine . . . article deleted. . . oh, the bot won't permit it.

• Delete per nom and RGT. Joe 03:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The SubGenius must have SLACK!!!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.