Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. I checked Google for sources, and while Ridis gets a bunch of google hits, none of them appear to have any relationship to this company. Deleted for being unattributable and not satisfying WP:CORP. Mo0[talk] 01:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ridis

Ridis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested proposed deletion. I support delete, because the material is not attributable. Sancho (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - no references, so no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 14:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - notability not established, potentially WP:Spam. HagenUK 20:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete - No mention of notability, but if kept, it needs a rewrite to not seem so much like a company history page. Also, if it has that many stores and other products, I have a feeling there might actually be sources for the company, thus the weak part. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 06:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.