Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridgeback Bikes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 03:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ridgeback Bikes

A fairly non-notable bicycle manufacturer. There are many similar companies out there and I can't see how this one deserves a wiki entry. It's not even good enough to qualify for the "pointless advert" criteria Gretnagod 12:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete, 11000 Ghits when searching "Ridgeback Bikes".--Jusjih 14:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep seems notable to me based on number of Google hits. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Google hits are not a criterion for corporate notability. (And just as well, because I find only 87 unique hits, myself - [1]) WP:CORP is, and there is no evidence this company meets it. RGTraynor 14:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete, tells me little that I didn't learn in the title, and their web site has to be one of the most annoying sites I can recall seeing. Would cheerfully keep an informative version. Smerdis of Tlön 18:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: could you fix the AFD notice which is currently broken…TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 16:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. - Rudykog 23:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. -- No Guru 16:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.