Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Fuller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rick Fuller

Rick Fuller (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

PROD removed, non-notable wrestler, fails WP:V, WP:A and WP:BLP. Darrenhusted 00:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, per nom and my original vote. Nikki311 00:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. Nenog 03:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. OysterGuitarst 04:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —John Vandenberg 09:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep A huge part of WCW in their peak of 1997-1999 and was featured in several of their video games. Won tons of matches on Nitro and Saturday Night, and he deserves an article, and is very notable. Dannycali 00:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, valid points, not reflected by this article, it has no references for a start, and what has he done since 1999? Darrenhusted 22:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Transwiki (or delete) For reasons given by Dannycali. Certainly an article I plan on adding to in the near future, and I hope others do too. DanZero 04:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment after some basic research, it seems that Fuller never really achieved notability outside of the scope of his WCW Saturday Night-type status.--DanZero 15:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment try to make the "near future" some time this week. Darrenhusted 11:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment You know, some of us do have lives outside of this thing, we don't always have the time to find sources or improve articles. He is very notable, had a long career in WCW, one of the biggest wrestling orgs ever, and was pushed to an extent. Check ddtdigest.com or something. Dannycali 03:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.