Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Bartow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Ty 23:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rick Bartow

Rick Bartow (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Just one of the hundreds of thousands of minor painters with a work or two hanging in a few museums. Utterly non-notable. Qworty (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete The National Gallery and the Eiteljorg aren't minor museums, but that's not enough. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Works in museum collections and a couple of reviews in the art press satisfy WP:BIO.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - added ref to profile on NPR and Smithsonian-sponsored exhibit, has 32 Google book hits [1]. Novickas (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Added several other refs, including the exhibition of his carving in the gardens at the White House and a pic thereof. Novickas (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Meets notability. Portland Museum is also a pretty good credit, he's in the Getty Union List of Artist Names, has been written about more than a few times. Ewulp (talk) 02:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Novickas has demonstrated clear notability. Is it really too much to expect people to do a Google Books search before nominating for deletion? It would save a lot of people having to waste time discussing clearly notable subjects. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems notable and interesting....Modernist (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.