Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richieglobal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 21:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richieglobal

Non-notable start-up company, unverifiable, does not Google. Prod, prod2, deprodded. Accurizer 14:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Please do not delete this article. It represents a new organisation that is supportive of Australian community - Gold Coast in particular. Unfortunately it doesn't Google due to its current state of itegration, however it will within two weeks. RICHIEGLOBAL will approach several different journalists and authors that have discussed the company's generosity and potential and list them in Google. With the utmost respect, I ask that you may postpone the RICHIEGLOBAL article's deletion, at least until it has been fully readied and completed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RICHIEGLOBAL (talk • contribs)
• Delete. This may become notable in the future, but is not now. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Fan1967 14:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a place to document a company that might some day be notable. Copy&paste the text of the current article and save it on your hard disk so it's not lost. If one day there are verifiable external reliable sources explaining how this is a notable company, then you (or, much better, someone who is not connected with the company) can write an article about it. Wikipedia is not a business directory for fledgeling companies. Weregerbil 14:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a crystal ball, and WP is not a place to promote a company. -- Kicking222 15:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Fan1967.--Andeh 15:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Perhaps recreation when it does become notable would be appropriate. Xyrael ^T 16:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Absolutely no Google hits for this at all see [1]. A search of an Australia New Zealand media database and other sources comes up with nothing. Seems to be unverifiable at the moment. Capitalistroadster 21:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 21:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete CB ,nn and advert.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, if indeed it exists at all. -- The Anome 08:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; completely non-notable. --Roisterer 15:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable --Grahamec 07:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.