Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richie Campbell, Pianist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richie Campbell, Pianist

WP:COPYVIO from here DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 01:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as a copy-vio, I'm surprised no one caught that. Yanksox 01:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Clicking 'random article' is a habit of mine - you do find a lot of tat!! Also this article should be WP:VAIN as well the creating author is User:Campbellsongs DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 01:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment User:Get-noticed removed the Afd tag, it has been re-attached DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 02:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:VAIN. Seems to be non-notable. However, it seems to not be a copy-vio. See the page cited by David. The site seems to compile information from the web and lists Wikipedia's "new pages" page as its source. It also lists the full article as being the one at Wikipedia, seemingly sanctioning the page, but it has a copyright tag at the very bottom of the page, which is odd. Either way, delete as vanity and non-notable. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 02:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Yanksox Alphachimp talk 13:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per copyright and notability. If I saw it in Newpages, I would've put it under db-bio. --Domthedude001
  • Delete; I have put the {{copyvio}} tag on the page in place of the copyvio content (remember, we should always do that when we detect copyright violation!) You'll have to look in the history for the article content now. Mangojuicetalk 04:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.