Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richest cities by 2020

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 06:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Richest cities by 2020

Richest cities by 2020 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An article that solely consists of speculation about the future wealth of cities is not encyclopedic. If this information belongs anywhere on Wikipedia then it's as a link to an article about the *current* ranking of richest cities. It certainly doesn't deserve its own article, especially when it appears to be lifted from an uncited PricewaterhouseCoopers article. Hux 20:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete as obvious crystal balling. Batmanand | Talk 20:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete There is no reference to show the Statistic studies on this subject , It's someone's imagination. Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 20:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment AND HE HAS INCLUDED MUMBAI EVEN. ! Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 20:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment and check this out : Richest cities in the world . WHYYYY MAAAN ? WHHHHYYYYYYY ? WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ? Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 20:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment So I can nominate that article for AfD? Hey, I'm first for the day! Woo hoo! Clarityfiend 00:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment hehe , yes , it includes the same reasons . Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 07:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pure speculation! Corpx 21:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as WP:BOLLOCKS. Whatever "GDP in 2020 in $US BN" is, it's not based in reality. per everybody else. Okay, the AfD discussion for Richest cities in the world made things clearer. Clarityfiend 00:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per violation of WP:CRYSTAL.--JForget 00:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete this is speculation. Cedars 13:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per most of the above. Carlossuarez46 00:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete even if it is true that PwC did make such a study, said studies are still speculative. remember the flying cars that were supposed to be common by the year 2000?Balloonman 00:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Frigo 09:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • stink! My city didn't make the cut. pure speculation, delete. Kripto 11:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.