Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Sinclair (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. -Doc^g 01:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Sinclair (footballer)

Richard Sinclair (footballer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete Non-notable semi-professional footballer. Forbsey 21:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. --Wildnox(talk) 22:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 22:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Queen's Park is an oddity, but they still play in the Third Division of the Scottish league. We'd never delete a player for another team in that division (I trust!) or in the English Third Division, so even if not fully professional, QPFC players should still count as notable. -- Bpmullins | Talk 22:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Bpmullins - Daemonic Kangaroo 06:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete We have deleted articles for players in the Scottish First Division in the past, as it is not a fully-professional league. They are no full-time professional teams in the Scottish third division. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catchpole (talk • contribs) 10:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC).
• Delete, the Scottish Third Division is nowhere near notable. Punkmorten 10:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Bpmullins. Englishrose 10:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, per Bpmullins. Mattythewhite 22:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.