Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard S. Dennison, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richard S. Dennison, Jr.

Not Notable, possible hoax. There does seem to be a Georgetown law student named Richard Dennison, from NJ, but... so what? There is a Dennison Funeral Home in Florence, NJ, but it has one site, and it isn't in the senatorial district mentioned. Probably WP:Vanity and WP:AUTO (creating account has done nothing but create this entry and links to it.--Brianyoumans 03:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and WP:V. (Looks fishy: This person would have been between the ages of 15 and 23 if a speechwriter for Clinton while he was in office.) -AED 04:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Verifiability is a problem but the article appears to be in good faith. Notability is my main concern. - Richardcavell 05:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • My hoax comment was more about many of the details - being a speechwriter for Clinton, being considered as a political candidate, etc. Perhaps you could call that more verifiability than hoax... --Brianyoumans 05:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete per nom. subject not notable, and WP:NOT - articles relies on speculation and rumours "rumored among political circles to be a top prospect ..to unseat Republican State Senator Diane B. Allen" Ohconfucius 06:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ohconfucius. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Accurizer 23:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.