Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Pochinko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Pochinko

Richard Pochinko (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only cite given to show notability is a geocities page. Does this pass the WP:BIO criteria? The Anome 12:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Geocities is as reliable as MySpace or YouTube. In other words, not at all. As such, it fails WP:BIO. DarkAudit 14:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep with new references. But I still feel Geocities is not a reliable source. DarkAudit 12:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep A website on Geocities is not absolute evidence of non-notability. Of course, it doesn't show N. But by looking at what was there, and at the 560 ghits, about half are real: there's an academic lecture on the subject from the Institute of Canadian studies at the Univ. of Wollongon, a study guide from the Canadian Arts Center, etc. I've added a few quotes in the references--they will need to be integrated into the article. Circus studies is a real field academically, and circus performers can be N as artists. DGG 03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.