Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Gray
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Proto::type 15:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Richard Gray
NN 'level designer', in one game. Fails WP:BIO ElaragirlTalk|Count 22:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable level designer, co-founded Ritual Entertainment. If you want to add sources, a Google for levelord interviews brings up quite a few. - Hahnchen 00:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Hahnchen. Combination 01:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Are you going to fix the article? As it stands, it's unsourced. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 03:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Hangchen. Levelord is notable and has been quoted in game industry publications. That said, I don't have the sources on hand. --Alan Au 07:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 03:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- In other words... someone's 'heard of him' but there's no verifiable notability? dryly Why am I not suprised? --ElaragirlTalk|Count 07:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hello, did you look at my comment, did you look the link? Why am I not surprised? - Hahnchen 15:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- In the google results, there were links to Gamespy, IGN, Firing Squad. You're talking about a guy who made his fame in computer games with Duke Nukem 3D, which was years ago, you might have to look deeper. For example, an article retrieved from archive.org from GamaSutra. - Hahnchen 15:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- In other words... someone's 'heard of him' but there's no verifiable notability? dryly Why am I not suprised? --ElaragirlTalk|Count 07:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.